Reduction: Rudrata Path to Spanning Tree with Exact Leaves
Introduction
This post provides a detailed proof that the Spanning Tree with Exact Leaves problem is NP-complete by reducing from Rudrata Path. The problem asks whether a graph has a spanning tree whose set of leaves is precisely a given set L.
Problem Definitions
Spanning Tree with Exact Leaves Problem
Input:
- An undirected graph G = (V, E)
- A set of nodes L ⊆ V
Output: YES if G has a spanning tree such that its set of leaves is precisely the set L, NO otherwise.
Note: The leaves of a tree are vertices of degree 1. The problem asks for a spanning tree where exactly the vertices in L are leaves, and all other vertices are not leaves.
Rudrata Path Problem
Input:
- An undirected graph G = (V, E)
- Two vertices s, t ∈ V
Output: YES if G contains a Rudrata (s,t)-path (path from s to t visiting all vertices exactly once), NO otherwise.
1. NP-Completeness Proof of Spanning Tree with L ≤ V Leaves: Solution Validation
Spanning Tree with Exact Leaves ∈ NP
Verification Algorithm: Given a candidate solution (spanning tree T):
- Check that T is a tree: O(n) time (n-1 edges, connected)
- Check that T spans all vertices: O(n) time
- Identify leaves (vertices of degree 1): O(n) time
- Check that the set of leaves equals L: O(n) time
Total Time: O(n), which is polynomial in input size.
Conclusion: Spanning Tree with Exact Leaves ∈ NP.
2. Reduce Rudrata Path to Spanning Tree with Exact Leaves
Key Insight: Given a Rudrata Path instance, we can reduce it to Spanning Tree with Exact Leaves by setting L = {s, t}. A Rudrata path has exactly 2 leaves (the endpoints s and t), and a spanning tree that is a path has exactly these two vertices as leaves.
Hint: A path has exactly 2 leaves (the endpoints). A spanning tree that is a path has exactly 2 leaves: the start and end vertices. Therefore, finding a Rudrata (s,t)-path is equivalent to finding a spanning tree with leaves exactly {s, t}.
2.1 Input Conversion
Given a Rudrata Path instance (G, s, t) where G = (V, E) and we want a path from s to t visiting all vertices, we construct a Spanning Tree with Exact Leaves instance (G’, L).
Construction:
Step 1: Copy Graph
- G’ = G (same graph, no changes)
Step 2: Set Leaf Set
- L = {s, t} (we want a spanning tree with exactly s and t as leaves)
Step 3: Result
- Spanning Tree with Exact Leaves instance: (G’, {s, t})
Detailed Example:
Consider Rudrata Path instance:
- Graph G with vertices {1, 2, 3, 4}
- Edges: {(1,2), (2,3), (3,4), (1,4)}
- s = 1, t = 4
Transformation:
- G’ = G (same graph)
- L = {1, 4} (s = 1, t = 4)
Spanning Tree with Exact Leaves instance: (G’, {1, 4})
2.2 Output Conversion
Given: Spanning Tree with Exact Leaves solution (spanning tree T with leaves exactly L = {s, t})
Extract Rudrata Path:
- Since T has exactly 2 leaves (s and t) and T is a tree on n vertices, T must be a path
- A tree with exactly 2 leaves is a path
- The path has endpoints s and t
- The path visits all vertices exactly once
- Therefore, T is a Rudrata (s,t)-path
Verify Satisfaction:
- T is a spanning tree: ✓
- T has leaves exactly {s, t}: ✓ (by assumption)
- T is a path: ✓ (since it has exactly 2 leaves)
- The path visits all vertices: ✓ (since T is spanning)
- The path goes from s to t: ✓ (since s and t are the endpoints)
- Therefore, T is a Rudrata (s,t)-path: ✓
3. Correctness Justification
3.1 If Rudrata Path has a solution, then Spanning Tree with Exact Leaves has a solution
Given: Rudrata Path instance (G, s, t) has solution P (path from s to t visiting all vertices).
Construct Spanning Tree Solution:
- Use path P as the spanning tree T
- P visits all n vertices exactly once
- P has exactly 2 leaves: s and t
- P is a tree (connected, n-1 edges)
- Therefore, T = P is a spanning tree with leaves exactly {s, t} = L
Verify Satisfaction:
- T spans all vertices: ✓ (since P visits all vertices)
- T is a tree: ✓ (path is a tree)
- T has leaves exactly {s, t}: ✓ (s and t are the endpoints, all other vertices have degree 2)
- Therefore, the set of leaves equals L = {s, t}: ✓
Conclusion: Spanning Tree with Exact Leaves has a solution.
3.2a If Rudrata Path does not have a solution, then Spanning Tree with Exact Leaves has no solution
Given: Rudrata Path instance (G, s, t) has no solution (no path from s to t visiting all vertices).
Proof:
Assume: Spanning Tree with Exact Leaves instance (G’, {s, t}) has a solution (spanning tree T with leaves exactly {s, t}).
Extract Path:
- Since T has exactly 2 leaves (s and t) and T is a tree, T must be a path
- A tree with exactly 2 leaves is a path
- T has endpoints s and t
- T visits all n vertices exactly once
- T is a path from s to t in G’ = G
- Therefore, T is a Rudrata (s,t)-path
Contradiction:
- T is a Rudrata (s,t)-path in G
- This contradicts the assumption that G has no Rudrata (s,t)-path
Conclusion: Spanning Tree with Exact Leaves has no solution.
3.2b If Spanning Tree with Exact Leaves has a solution, then Rudrata Path has a solution
Given: Spanning Tree with Exact Leaves instance (G’, {s, t}) has solution (spanning tree T with leaves exactly {s, t}).
Extract Path:
- Since T has exactly 2 leaves (s and t) and T is a tree, T must be a path
- A tree with exactly 2 leaves is a path
- T has endpoints s and t
- T visits all n vertices exactly once
- T is a path from s to t in G’ = G
Verify Satisfaction:
Rudrata Path Requirements:
- Path visits all n vertices exactly once: ✓ (since T is a path spanning all vertices)
- Path goes from s to t: ✓ (since s and t are the endpoints)
- All edges in path exist in G: ✓ (since T is a subgraph of G)
- Therefore, T is a Rudrata (s,t)-path
Key Insight:
- A spanning tree with exactly 2 leaves is a path
- If the leaves are exactly {s, t}, then the path goes from s to t
- A path visiting all vertices from s to t is exactly a Rudrata (s,t)-path
- Therefore, any solution to Spanning Tree with Exact Leaves gives us a Rudrata (s,t)-path
Conclusion: The spanning tree T forms a Rudrata (s,t)-path in G, so Rudrata Path has a solution.
Polynomial Time Analysis
Input Size:
- Rudrata Path: Graph G with n vertices and m edges, vertices s and t
- Spanning Tree with Exact Leaves: Graph G’ with n vertices and m edges, set L = {s, t}
Construction Time:
- Copy graph G: O(n + m) time
- Set L = {s, t}: O(1) time
- Total: O(n + m) time
Conclusion: Reduction is polynomial-time.
Summary
We have shown:
- Spanning Tree with Exact Leaves ∈ NP: Solutions can be verified in polynomial time
- Rudrata Path ≤ₚ Spanning Tree with Exact Leaves: Polynomial-time reduction exists
- Correctness: Rudrata Path has solution ↔ Spanning Tree with Exact Leaves has solution
Therefore, Spanning Tree with Exact Leaves is NP-complete.
Key Insights
- Path Structure: A tree with exactly 2 leaves is a path
- Spanning Property: A spanning tree that is a path visits all vertices exactly once
- Exact Leaf Constraint: Requiring exactly {s, t} as leaves forces the path to go from s to t
- Preservation: The reduction preserves the path structure through the exact leaf set constraint
Practice Questions
- Modify the reduction to reduce Rudrata Cycle to Spanning Tree with Exact Leaves. What set L would you use?
- Extend the reduction to handle directed graphs. How would the reduction change?
- Consider weighted versions: How would you reduce weighted Rudrata Path to weighted Spanning Tree?
- Prove the reverse reduction: Can we reduce Spanning Tree with Exact Leaves to Rudrata Path? How?
- Investigate special cases: For what sets L is the problem polynomial-time solvable?
This reduction demonstrates how structural constraints (number of leaves) can capture path properties, enabling reductions between path-finding and tree problems.