Introduction
Designing a to-do list application with multi-user collaboration is a complex distributed systems problem that tests your ability to build real-time collaborative systems. The application must support task lists, sharing with collaborators, real-time synchronization, date/time reminders, and notifications to all collaborators.
This post provides a detailed walkthrough of designing a collaborative to-do list application, covering key architectural decisions, real-time synchronization, conflict resolution, reminder scheduling, and notification delivery. This is a common system design interview question that tests your understanding of distributed systems, real-time collaboration, WebSocket connections, and event-driven architectures.
Table of Contents
- Problem Statement
- Requirements
- Capacity Estimation
- Core Entities
- API
- Data Flow
- Database Design
- High-Level Design
- Deep Dive
- What Interviewers Look For
- Summary
Problem Statement
Design a to-do list application similar to iPhone’s Reminder app that:
- Allows users to create task lists
- Share lists with other users for collaboration
- Set date/time reminders that notify all collaborators
- Real-time synchronization of changes across all collaborators
- Handle concurrent edits and conflicts
- Support offline mode with sync when online
Scale Requirements:
- 100M+ users
- 50M+ daily active users
- 1B+ tasks across all lists
- 10M+ shared lists
- 1M+ reminder notifications per hour
- Real-time updates with < 200ms latency
- Support lists with up to 50 collaborators
Key Challenges:
- Real-time synchronization across multiple clients
- Conflict resolution for concurrent edits
- Reminder scheduling and notification delivery
- Sharing permissions and access control
- Offline support with eventual consistency
- Handling high-frequency updates
Requirements
Functional Requirements
Core Features:
- Task Lists: Users can create, edit, and delete task lists
- Tasks: Users can create, edit, complete, and delete tasks within lists
- Sharing: Users can share lists with other users (read-only or read-write)
- Real-Time Sync: Changes appear instantly for all collaborators
- Reminders: Users can set date/time reminders for tasks
- Notifications: All collaborators receive notifications for reminders
- Offline Support: App works offline, syncs when online
- Conflict Resolution: Handle concurrent edits gracefully
Task Features:
- Title, description, notes
- Due date and time
- Priority (low, medium, high)
- Completion status
- Subtasks (nested tasks)
- Attachments (optional)
Sharing Features:
- Share list with specific users
- Permission levels: owner, editor, viewer
- Add/remove collaborators
- View who’s currently viewing/editing
Reminder Features:
- Date/time reminders
- Recurring reminders (daily, weekly, monthly)
- Location-based reminders (optional)
- Notification to all collaborators
Out of Scope:
- Voice input for tasks
- Task templates
- Task dependencies
- Time tracking
- Advanced analytics
Non-Functional Requirements
- Availability: 99.9% uptime
- Reliability: No data loss, all changes persisted
- Performance:
- Create/update task: < 200ms (P95)
- Real-time sync latency: < 200ms
- List load time: < 500ms (P95)
- Reminder notification: < 1 second from scheduled time
- Scalability: Handle 50M+ DAU, 1B+ tasks
- Consistency:
- Strong consistency for task updates (within list)
- Eventual consistency acceptable for cross-list operations
- Real-Time: Changes must appear instantly for online collaborators
- Offline Support: App must work offline, sync when online
Capacity Estimation
Traffic Estimates
- Daily Active Users (DAU): 50 million
- Tasks Created: 200M per day = 2,315 tasks/second average
- Task Updates: 500M per day = 5,787 updates/second average
- List Shares: 1M per day = 12 shares/second average
- Reminder Notifications: 1M per hour = 278 notifications/second average
- Real-Time Updates: 10M per day = 116 updates/second average
- Peak Traffic: 3x average = 7,000 tasks/second, 17,000 updates/second
Storage Estimates
Tasks:
- 1B total tasks
- Average task size: 512 bytes (task_id, list_id, title, description, due_date, etc.)
- Total task storage: 1B × 512 bytes = 512GB
Lists:
- 100M lists
- Average list size: 256 bytes (list_id, name, owner_id, etc.)
- Total list storage: 100M × 256 bytes = 25.6GB
Shares:
- 10M shared lists
- Average share record: 128 bytes (list_id, user_id, permission)
- Total share storage: 10M × 128 bytes = 1.28GB
Reminders:
- 100M active reminders
- Average reminder size: 256 bytes (reminder_id, task_id, scheduled_time, etc.)
- Total reminder storage: 100M × 256 bytes = 25.6GB
Total Storage: ~565GB (mostly tasks)
Core Entities
List
- Attributes: list_id, name, owner_id, created_at, updated_at, color, icon
- Relationships: Has many tasks, has many shares, has many collaborators
- Purpose: Container for tasks
Task
- Attributes: task_id, list_id, title, description, notes, due_date, due_time, priority, completed, created_at, updated_at, created_by, completed_by
- Relationships: Belongs to list, can have subtasks, can have reminders
- Purpose: Individual to-do item
Share
- Attributes: share_id, list_id, user_id, permission (owner, editor, viewer), shared_at, shared_by
- Relationships: Links list to user with permission
- Purpose: Manage list sharing and permissions
Reminder
- Attributes: reminder_id, task_id, scheduled_time, recurring_pattern, timezone, created_at
- Relationships: Belongs to task
- Purpose: Schedule and trigger notifications
Notification
- Attributes: notification_id, user_id, task_id, list_id, type, message, sent_at, read_at
- Relationships: Sent to user, related to task/list
- Purpose: Deliver reminders and updates to users
CollaborationEvent
- Attributes: event_id, list_id, user_id, event_type, event_data, timestamp
- Event Types: TASK_CREATED, TASK_UPDATED, TASK_COMPLETED, TASK_DELETED, LIST_UPDATED
- Purpose: Track changes for real-time sync and conflict resolution
API
1. Create List
POST /api/v1/lists
Headers:
- Authorization: Bearer <token>
Body:
- name: string
- color: string (optional)
- icon: string (optional)
Response:
- list_id: string
- name: string
- created_at: timestamp
2. Get Lists
GET /api/v1/lists
Headers:
- Authorization: Bearer <token>
Query Parameters:
- include_shared: boolean (default: true)
Response:
- lists: array of list objects
3. Create Task
POST /api/v1/lists/{list_id}/tasks
Headers:
- Authorization: Bearer <token>
Body:
- title: string
- description: string (optional)
- due_date: date (optional)
- due_time: time (optional)
- priority: string (low, medium, high) (optional)
- parent_task_id: string (optional, for subtasks)
Response:
- task_id: string
- title: string
- created_at: timestamp
4. Update Task
PATCH /api/v1/tasks/{task_id}
Headers:
- Authorization: Bearer <token>
Body:
- title: string (optional)
- description: string (optional)
- due_date: date (optional)
- due_time: time (optional)
- priority: string (optional)
- completed: boolean (optional)
Response:
- task_id: string
- updated_at: timestamp
5. Share List
POST /api/v1/lists/{list_id}/share
Headers:
- Authorization: Bearer <token>
Body:
- user_id: string
- permission: string (editor, viewer)
Response:
- share_id: string
- user_id: string
- permission: string
6. Set Reminder
POST /api/v1/tasks/{task_id}/reminders
Headers:
- Authorization: Bearer <token>
Body:
- scheduled_time: timestamp
- recurring_pattern: string (optional, e.g., "daily", "weekly")
- timezone: string
Response:
- reminder_id: string
- scheduled_time: timestamp
7. Real-Time Updates (WebSocket)
WebSocket: wss://api.example.com/v1/lists/{list_id}/updates
Events:
- task_created: { task_id, list_id, title, created_by }
- task_updated: { task_id, changes, updated_by }
- task_completed: { task_id, completed_by }
- task_deleted: { task_id, deleted_by }
- list_updated: { list_id, changes, updated_by }
- collaborator_joined: { user_id, list_id }
- collaborator_left: { user_id, list_id }
8. Get Task History
GET /api/v1/tasks/{task_id}/history
Headers:
- Authorization: Bearer <token>
Query Parameters:
- limit: integer (default: 50)
- cursor: string (pagination)
Response:
- events: array of collaboration events
- next_cursor: string
Data Flow
Create Task Flow
1. Client → API Gateway
2. API Gateway → Auth Service (validate token)
3. API Gateway → Task Service
4. Task Service:
a. Validate user has permission (editor/owner)
b. Create task record in database
c. Create collaboration event
d. Publish event to message queue
e. Broadcast to WebSocket connections (real-time)
f. Return task_id
5. Real-Time Service:
a. Receives event from queue
b. Broadcasts to all WebSocket connections for list
c. Clients receive update instantly
Real-Time Sync Flow
1. User A updates task:
a. Client sends update to API
b. API updates database
c. API publishes event to Kafka
d. Real-Time Service receives event
e. Real-Time Service broadcasts to all WebSocket connections
2. User B receives update:
a. WebSocket receives event
b. Client applies update locally
c. UI updates instantly
Reminder Flow
1. Reminder Scheduler (Background Worker):
a. Polls reminders table for due reminders
b. Finds reminders where scheduled_time <= now()
c. For each reminder:
- Get task and list details
- Get all collaborators for list
- Create notification for each collaborator
- Send push notification
- Update reminder status
Share List Flow
1. User A shares list with User B:
a. Client sends share request
b. API validates User A is owner/editor
c. API creates share record
d. API sends notification to User B
e. User B receives notification
f. User B can now access list
Database Design
Schema Design
Lists Table
CREATE TABLE lists (
list_id VARCHAR(100) PRIMARY KEY,
name VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
owner_id BIGINT NOT NULL,
color VARCHAR(50),
icon VARCHAR(50),
created_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
updated_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP ON UPDATE CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
version INT DEFAULT 0, -- For optimistic locking
INDEX idx_owner (owner_id),
INDEX idx_updated (updated_at)
) ENGINE=InnoDB;
-- Sharded by list_id
Tasks Table
CREATE TABLE tasks (
task_id VARCHAR(100) PRIMARY KEY,
list_id VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL,
title VARCHAR(500) NOT NULL,
description TEXT,
notes TEXT,
due_date DATE,
due_time TIME,
priority ENUM('low', 'medium', 'high') DEFAULT 'medium',
completed BOOLEAN DEFAULT FALSE,
completed_at TIMESTAMP,
parent_task_id VARCHAR(100), -- For subtasks
created_by BIGINT NOT NULL,
completed_by BIGINT,
created_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
updated_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP ON UPDATE CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
version INT DEFAULT 0, -- For optimistic locking
INDEX idx_list (list_id, created_at),
INDEX idx_due_date (due_date, completed),
INDEX idx_parent (parent_task_id),
FOREIGN KEY (list_id) REFERENCES lists(list_id) ON DELETE CASCADE
) ENGINE=InnoDB;
-- Sharded by list_id (aligned with lists)
Shares Table
CREATE TABLE shares (
share_id VARCHAR(100) PRIMARY KEY,
list_id VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL,
user_id BIGINT NOT NULL,
permission ENUM('owner', 'editor', 'viewer') NOT NULL,
shared_by BIGINT NOT NULL,
shared_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
INDEX idx_list (list_id),
INDEX idx_user (user_id),
UNIQUE KEY uk_list_user (list_id, user_id),
FOREIGN KEY (list_id) REFERENCES lists(list_id) ON DELETE CASCADE
) ENGINE=InnoDB;
-- Sharded by list_id (aligned with lists)
Reminders Table
CREATE TABLE reminders (
reminder_id VARCHAR(100) PRIMARY KEY,
task_id VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL,
scheduled_time TIMESTAMP NOT NULL,
recurring_pattern VARCHAR(50), -- "daily", "weekly", "monthly", etc.
timezone VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL,
status ENUM('pending', 'sent', 'cancelled') DEFAULT 'pending',
created_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
INDEX idx_scheduled (scheduled_time, status),
INDEX idx_task (task_id),
FOREIGN KEY (task_id) REFERENCES tasks(task_id) ON DELETE CASCADE
) ENGINE=InnoDB;
-- Sharded by scheduled_time (for efficient polling)
Notifications Table
CREATE TABLE notifications (
notification_id VARCHAR(100) PRIMARY KEY,
user_id BIGINT NOT NULL,
task_id VARCHAR(100),
list_id VARCHAR(100),
type VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL, -- 'reminder', 'task_updated', 'list_shared', etc.
message TEXT NOT NULL,
sent_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
read_at TIMESTAMP,
INDEX idx_user (user_id, sent_at),
INDEX idx_task (task_id),
INDEX idx_list (list_id)
) ENGINE=InnoDB;
-- Sharded by user_id
CollaborationEvents Table
CREATE TABLE collaboration_events (
event_id VARCHAR(100) PRIMARY KEY,
list_id VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL,
user_id BIGINT NOT NULL,
event_type VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL,
task_id VARCHAR(100),
event_data JSON,
timestamp TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
INDEX idx_list (list_id, timestamp),
INDEX idx_user (user_id, timestamp),
INDEX idx_task (task_id)
) ENGINE=InnoDB;
-- Sharded by list_id (aligned with lists)
Database Sharding Strategy
Lists Table:
- Shard Key:
list_id - Sharding Strategy: Hash-based sharding
- Number of Shards: 100 shards
- Reasoning: Lists are accessed by list_id
Tasks Table:
- Shard Key:
list_id(aligned with lists) - Sharding Strategy: Hash-based sharding
- Number of Shards: 100 shards
- Reasoning: Tasks are always accessed with list_id
Shares Table:
- Shard Key:
list_id(aligned with lists) - Sharding Strategy: Hash-based sharding
- Number of Shards: 100 shards
- Reasoning: Shares are accessed with list_id
Reminders Table:
- Shard Key:
scheduled_time(time-based sharding) - Sharding Strategy: Range-based sharding by time
- Number of Shards: 100 shards
- Reasoning: Reminders are queried by scheduled_time
Notifications Table:
- Shard Key:
user_id - Sharding Strategy: Hash-based sharding
- Number of Shards: 100 shards
- Reasoning: Notifications are accessed by user_id
CollaborationEvents Table:
- Shard Key:
list_id(aligned with lists) - Sharding Strategy: Hash-based sharding
- Number of Shards: 100 shards
- Reasoning: Events are accessed with list_id
High-Level Design
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Client Applications │
│ (iOS, Android, Web) │
└────────────────────┬────────────────────────────────────┘
│
│ HTTPS / WebSocket
│
┌────────────────────▼────────────────────────────────────┐
│ API Gateway / LB │
│ (Rate Limiting, Auth) │
└────────────────────┬────────────────────────────────────┘
│
┌───────────┴───────────┐
│ │
┌────────▼────────┐ ┌─────────▼─────────┐
│ Task Service │ │ List Service │
│ (CRUD Tasks) │ │ (CRUD Lists) │
└────────┬────────┘ └─────────┬──────────┘
│ │
│ │
┌────────▼───────────────────────▼──────────┐
│ Real-Time Service │
│ (WebSocket, Event Broadcasting) │
└────────┬──────────────────────────────────┘
│
│
┌────────▼──────────────────────────────────┐
│ Message Queue (Kafka) │
│ (Collaboration Events, Notifications) │
└────────┬──────────────────────────────────┘
│
│
┌────────▼──────────────────────────────────┐
│ Database Cluster │
│ (Lists, Tasks, Shares, Reminders) │
└────────┬───────────────────────────────────┘
│
│
┌────────▼──────────────────────────────────┐
│ Reminder Scheduler Service │
│ (Background Worker, Polls Reminders) │
└────────┬──────────────────────────────────┘
│
│
┌────────▼──────────────────────────────────┐
│ Notification Service │
│ (Push Notifications, Email, SMS) │
└────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Deep Dive
Component Design
1. Task Service
- Responsibilities: Create, update, delete tasks, validate permissions
- Optimization:
- Fast task operations
- Permission checking
- Optimistic locking for conflict resolution
2. List Service
- Responsibilities: Create, update, delete lists, manage shares
- Optimization:
- Fast list operations
- Share management
- Permission validation
3. Real-Time Service
- Responsibilities: WebSocket connections, event broadcasting
- Optimization:
- Connection pooling
- Efficient message routing
- Presence management
4. Reminder Scheduler Service
- Responsibilities: Poll reminders, trigger notifications
- Optimization:
- Efficient polling (sorted by scheduled_time)
- Batch processing
- Timezone handling
5. Notification Service
- Responsibilities: Send push notifications, email, SMS
- Optimization:
- Multi-channel delivery
- Batching
- Retry logic
Real-Time Synchronization
WebSocket Connection Management
Connection Per List:
- Each client opens WebSocket connection per active list
- Connection key:
ws:{user_id}:{list_id} - Heartbeat to keep connection alive
Message Types:
// Task created
{
"type": "task_created",
"task_id": "task_123",
"list_id": "list_456",
"title": "Buy groceries",
"created_by": "user_789",
"timestamp": "2025-11-25T10:00:00Z"
}
// Task updated
{
"type": "task_updated",
"task_id": "task_123",
"changes": {
"title": "Buy groceries and cook",
"priority": "high"
},
"updated_by": "user_789",
"timestamp": "2025-11-25T10:05:00Z"
}
// Task completed
{
"type": "task_completed",
"task_id": "task_123",
"completed_by": "user_789",
"timestamp": "2025-11-25T10:10:00Z"
}
Event Broadcasting:
def broadcast_task_update(list_id, event):
# Get all WebSocket connections for list
connections = websocket_manager.get_connections(list_id)
# Broadcast to all connections
for connection in connections:
connection.send(json.dumps(event))
Event Sourcing
Store All Events:
- Every change stored as event
- Events used for:
- Real-time sync
- Conflict resolution
- Audit trail
- Offline sync
Event Ordering:
- Use timestamp + sequence number
- Client can replay events in order
- Handle out-of-order events
Conflict Resolution
Challenge
Multiple users editing same task simultaneously.
Solution: Optimistic Locking + Operational Transformation
Optimistic Locking:
def update_task(task_id, changes, user_id, expected_version):
# Check version
task = db.query("""
SELECT version
FROM tasks
WHERE task_id = ?
""", task_id)
if task.version != expected_version:
# Conflict detected
raise ConflictError("Task was modified by another user")
# Update task
db.execute("""
UPDATE tasks
SET title = ?,
version = version + 1,
updated_at = NOW()
WHERE task_id = ?
AND version = ?
""", changes['title'], task_id, expected_version)
# Create event
create_event("task_updated", task_id, changes, user_id)
Operational Transformation (OT):
- Transform concurrent operations
- Apply operations in correct order
- Resolve conflicts automatically
Last-Write-Wins (Simpler Alternative):
- Accept last update
- Show conflict notification to user
- Let user choose which version to keep
Reminder System
Reminder Scheduling
Database Polling:
def poll_reminders():
while True:
# Get due reminders
now = datetime.now()
reminders = db.query("""
SELECT * FROM reminders
WHERE scheduled_time <= ?
AND status = 'pending'
ORDER BY scheduled_time ASC
LIMIT 1000
""", now)
for reminder in reminders:
# Get task and list
task = get_task(reminder.task_id)
list = get_list(task.list_id)
# Get all collaborators
collaborators = get_list_collaborators(list.list_id)
# Create notifications
for collaborator in collaborators:
create_notification(
user_id=collaborator.user_id,
task_id=task.task_id,
list_id=list.list_id,
type='reminder',
message=f"Reminder: {task.title}"
)
# Update reminder status
if reminder.recurring_pattern:
# Schedule next occurrence
next_time = calculate_next_occurrence(
reminder.scheduled_time,
reminder.recurring_pattern
)
db.execute("""
UPDATE reminders
SET scheduled_time = ?
WHERE reminder_id = ?
""", next_time, reminder.reminder_id)
else:
# Mark as sent
db.execute("""
UPDATE reminders
SET status = 'sent'
WHERE reminder_id = ?
""", reminder.reminder_id)
time.sleep(1) # Poll every second
Optimization:
- Index on
scheduled_timeandstatus - Batch processing (process 1000 at a time)
- Timezone handling (store timezone with reminder)
Notification System
Multi-Channel Notifications
Push Notifications:
- iOS (APNs)
- Android (FCM)
- Web (Web Push)
Email Notifications:
- For important reminders
- Daily digest option
In-App Notifications:
- Real-time via WebSocket
- Notification badge
Notification Delivery:
def send_notification(user_id, notification):
# Get user preferences
preferences = get_notification_preferences(user_id)
# Send via preferred channels
if preferences.push_enabled:
send_push_notification(user_id, notification)
if preferences.email_enabled:
send_email_notification(user_id, notification)
# Store notification
db.execute("""
INSERT INTO notifications
(notification_id, user_id, task_id, list_id, type, message)
VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
""", generate_id(), user_id, notification.task_id,
notification.list_id, notification.type, notification.message)
Sharing and Permissions
Permission Model
Permission Levels:
- Owner: Full control (edit, delete, share)
- Editor: Can edit tasks, cannot delete list
- Viewer: Read-only access
Permission Checking:
def check_permission(user_id, list_id, required_permission):
# Get user's permission for list
share = db.query("""
SELECT permission
FROM shares
WHERE list_id = ? AND user_id = ?
""", list_id, user_id)
if not share:
# Check if user is owner
list = get_list(list_id)
if list.owner_id == user_id:
return True
return False
# Check permission level
permission_levels = {'owner': 3, 'editor': 2, 'viewer': 1}
required_level = permission_levels[required_permission]
user_level = permission_levels[share.permission]
return user_level >= required_level
Scalability Considerations
Horizontal Scaling
Task Service:
- Stateless service
- Horizontal scaling (multiple instances)
- Load balanced
Real-Time Service:
- Multiple WebSocket servers
- Connection routing by list_id
- Message queue for cross-server communication
Reminder Scheduler:
- Multiple scheduler workers
- Partition reminders by scheduled_time
- Each worker handles subset of reminders
Database Scaling
Read Replicas:
- Use read replicas for queries
- Reduces load on primary database
Sharding:
- Shard by list_id, user_id, scheduled_time
- Distribute load across shards
Caching:
- Cache frequently accessed lists
- Cache user permissions
- Cache reminder schedules
Failure Handling
WebSocket Connection Failure
Scenario: WebSocket connection drops.
Solution:
- Client reconnects automatically
- Server sends missed events on reconnect
- Use event sequence numbers to detect gaps
Reminder Missed
Scenario: Reminder not triggered (scheduler down).
Solution:
- Reconciliation job (find missed reminders)
- Retry missed reminders
- Alert on missed reminders
Conflict Resolution Failure
Scenario: Conflict cannot be resolved automatically.
Solution:
- Store conflict for manual resolution
- Notify users of conflict
- Provide conflict resolution UI
Trade-offs and Optimizations
Trade-offs
- Consistency vs Latency
- Choice: Eventual consistency for cross-list operations
- Reason: Better performance, lower latency
- Benefit: Fast updates, good UX
- Real-Time vs Scalability
- Choice: WebSocket for real-time, message queue for scale
- Reason: WebSocket for instant updates, queue for reliability
- Benefit: Best of both worlds
- Conflict Resolution Complexity
- Choice: Optimistic locking + last-write-wins (simpler)
- Reason: Balance correctness and complexity
- Benefit: Good enough for most cases
Optimizations
- Event Batching
- Batch multiple events in single message
- Reduces WebSocket messages
- Better throughput
- Connection Pooling
- Pool WebSocket connections
- Pool database connections
- Better resource utilization
- Caching
- Cache list metadata
- Cache user permissions
- Cache reminder schedules
- Reduces database queries
- Lazy Loading
- Load tasks on demand
- Paginate task lists
- Reduces initial load time
What Interviewers Look For
Distributed Systems Skills
- Real-Time Synchronization
- WebSocket architecture
- Event broadcasting
- Low-latency updates
- Red Flags: Polling, high latency, no real-time
- Conflict Resolution
- Optimistic locking
- Operational transformation
- Conflict handling
- Red Flags: No conflict handling, data loss, poor UX
- Event-Driven Architecture
- Event sourcing
- Message queues
- Event ordering
- Red Flags: No events, no ordering, no audit trail
Problem-Solving Approach
- Collaboration Design
- Real-time sync strategy
- Conflict resolution approach
- Permission model
- Red Flags: No sync, no conflicts, no permissions
- Reminder System
- Scheduling approach
- Notification delivery
- Timezone handling
- Red Flags: No scheduling, no notifications, no timezones
- Scalability
- Horizontal scaling
- Database sharding
- Caching strategy
- Red Flags: Vertical scaling only, no sharding, no caching
System Design Skills
- Component Design
- Clear service boundaries
- Proper API design
- Data flow understanding
- Red Flags: Monolithic design, unclear boundaries, poor APIs
- Database Design
- Proper sharding strategy
- Index design
- Relationship modeling
- Red Flags: No sharding, poor indexes, wrong relationships
- Real-Time Systems
- WebSocket management
- Connection handling
- Message routing
- Red Flags: Poor connection handling, no routing, no management
Communication Skills
- Clear Explanation
- Explains real-time sync approach
- Discusses conflict resolution
- Justifies design decisions
- Red Flags: Unclear explanations, no justification, confusing
- Architecture Diagrams
- Clear component diagram
- Shows data flow
- Real-time sync flow
- Red Flags: No diagrams, unclear diagrams, missing components
Meta-Specific Focus
- Collaborative Systems
- Understanding of real-time collaboration
- Conflict resolution patterns
- Event-driven architecture
- Key: Demonstrate collaborative systems expertise
- Real-Time Systems
- WebSocket expertise
- Low-latency requirements
- Event broadcasting
- Key: Show real-time systems mastery
- Notification Systems
- Multi-channel delivery
- Scheduling patterns
- Reliability
- Key: Demonstrate notification system expertise
Summary
Designing a to-do list application with multi-user collaboration requires careful consideration of real-time synchronization, conflict resolution, reminder scheduling, and notification delivery. Key design decisions include:
Architecture Highlights:
- WebSocket for real-time synchronization
- Event-driven architecture with message queues
- Optimistic locking for conflict resolution
- Database polling for reminder scheduling
- Multi-channel notification delivery
Key Patterns:
- Real-Time Sync: WebSocket + event broadcasting
- Conflict Resolution: Optimistic locking + version numbers
- Event Sourcing: Store all changes as events
- Reminder Scheduling: Database polling with efficient indexing
- Notification Delivery: Multi-channel (push, email, in-app)
Scalability Solutions:
- Horizontal scaling (multiple service instances)
- Database sharding (by list_id, user_id, scheduled_time)
- Caching (lists, permissions, reminders)
- Connection pooling (WebSocket, database)
Trade-offs:
- Consistency vs latency (eventual consistency for better performance)
- Real-time vs scalability (WebSocket + message queue)
- Conflict resolution complexity (optimistic locking + last-write-wins)
This design handles 50M+ DAU, 1B+ tasks, and maintains < 200ms real-time sync latency while ensuring no data loss and proper conflict resolution. The system is scalable, fault-tolerant, and optimized for collaborative task management.